Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 - There is no data What kind of RAM is supported Does Intel Core i9-9900K have embedded graphics? Intel Core i9-9900K operates on 3.6 GHz.2 GHz. Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 - There is no data. And Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 scored 22840 points.Ĭan Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 work in 4K mode? In the PassMark benchmark, Intel Core i9-9900K scored 17902. Here the frequency is There is no data MHz. Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 received video core There is no data. Intel Core i9-9900K has a graphics engine Intel UHD 630.
And the maximum amount of supported RAM is 1500 MB. The second processor Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 is capable of supporting DDR4. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 41.6. Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 on the 14 nm architecture. In terms of architecture, Intel Core i9-9900K is built using 14 nm technology. The maximum power consumption for the first processor is 95 W, and for Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 145 W. Intel Core i9-9900K is able to accelerate to 5 Hz, and the second to 3.6 Hz. I think at some point you just bite the bullet and buy something.The Intel Core i9-9900K processor runs at 3.6 Hz, the other Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 runs at 2.2 Hz. There are always new processors coming and they are always going to be a lot better than the ones we have right now.
#I7 7700k quicksync vs i7 9900k driver
QS is great for speed but we do get driver problems quite frequently, especially with new stuff. It has the H.265 thing which may or may not be helpful, but unless you can buy a Skylake at a bargain price why get one? I would expect my playback bug to be fixed in a future version. It is faster (about 10-20% based on some tests I have done) and pretty much the same price. If I was buying a new system now I would buy a Kaby Lake. This is nothing against GV I have been in this business for 20 years and it is based on experience. I would not base my decision to buy based an expectation of a few users on a forum. But I have not heard anything either way. If anyone is going to add QS playback for H.265 is will be GV purely based on the fact that they did it for H.264. If I want QS I just use the fast EDIUS native one (plus there is not enough time in the day to test everything). I did not bother to test it, however, because one of my main reasons to use the TMPEG plug-in or handbreak is the quality I can get from using X.264 instead of QS. TMPEG & handbreak had both options I believe.
I have not yet reported it to Grass Valley as it was only recently it came up and only happens on 4K projects with multiple layers (i.e.
If I turn off the QS playback they work ok. I believe QSV has two options to choose between speed and quality.
We will be getting some Kaby Lake processors in to test and I am expecting them to perform better than Skylake but I don't expect much improvement out of the Quick Sync encoding/playback.Hi David - Have you had a chance to to test with an i7-7700k yet? I see the 630 GPU also has h.265 4k 10bit hardware decoding. We will be getting some Kaby Lake processors in to test and I am expecting them to perform better than Skylake but I don't expect much improvement out of the Quick Sync encoding/playback. If you are comparing processors for playback then sometimes it is better to get a higher powered CPU rather than rely on Quick Sync since the high powered CPU soups up all kinds of footage rather than just H.264 based footage. With playback, Quick Sync lets me playback 2 streams of 4K video in a 4K project on an Skylake processor which is about the same as I can manage with an 8 core (and more expensive) Broadwell-E, which does not have Quick Sync and just uses the CPU. With Quick Sync the encoding is WAY faster than not using Quick Sync but some people choose other methods because they can get better quality in other ways, especially at lower bit rates (there are quite a few threads about this on the forum). I doubt whether any editing program will take advantage of the H.265 abilities yet. I am not sure whether there are any changes to do with H.264. The new thing with Kaby Lakes is that they have support for playback of H.265 video in the processor. Quick Sync is a lot faster for encoding than a using just an nVidia card and it will be the same for the Kaby Lake processors.
0 kommentar(er)
